Clin Osteol 2023; 28(1-2): 31-33

Exostosis of proximal femur -⁠ benign tumor, "malign" location: a case reportCase reports

Rendek Pavol1, Kokavec Milan1, Chládek Petr2
1 Ortopedická klinika LF UK a NÚDCH, Bratislava
2 Ortopedické oddělení, Vršovická Zdravotní, a. s., Praha

Osteocartilaginous exostosis, also called osteochondroma, is a benign bone tumor for most localized near the epiphyseal plate. It is the most common bone tumor, representing about 20-50 % of all benign bone tumors. Its radiological image is very typical -⁠ it is most often a pediculate formation with a cartilaginous cap. Osteochondromas can be solitary, cases of multiple occurrence are called hereditary multiple enchondromatosis (HME). Histologically it is categorized as a benign affection, clinically presenting with pain, a local palpable mass and restriction of movement. Histological malignization of the tumor is rare, reported in 1 % of cases. In the tumor can however be considered malignant in cases of adverse localization. In this article we present the case of a 15-year-old boy with an exostosis of the proximal femur with a prominent ischiofemoral impingement syndrome. After a biopsy and a partial resection, the tumor was treated via the surgical hip dislocation technique, which allows access to the femoral head without compromising its nutritional blood vessels. After a radical resection, the patient has been monitored for 4 years and his clinical and radiological condition is satisfactory.

Keywords: proximal femur; surgical hip dislocation; exostosis; osteochondroma

Received: January 12, 2023; Accepted: January 25, 2023; Published: June 11, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Rendek P, Kokavec M, Chládek P. Exostosis of proximal femur -⁠ benign tumor, "malign" location: a case report. Clinical Osteology. 2023;28(1-2):31-33.
Download citation

References

  1. 1. Scarborough MT, Moreau G. Benign cartilage tumors. Orthop Clin North Am 1996; 27(3): 583-589.
  2. 2. Wang SK, Park BM. Induction of osteochondromas by periosteal resection. Orthopedics 1991; 14(7): 809-812. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19910701-16>.
  3. 3. Karasick D, Schweitzer ME, Eschelman DJ. Symptomatic osteochondromas: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168(6): 1507-1512. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168715>.
  4. 4. De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AM, Ramon F. Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: is it useful or necessary? Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25(2): 137-141. D ostupné z DOI: < http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002560050050>.
  5. 5. Murphey MD, Choi J, Kransdorf MJ et al. Imaging of osteochondroma: Variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2000; 20(5): 1407-1434. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se171407>.
  6. 6. Humbert ET, Mehlman C, Crawford AH. Two cases of osteochondroma recurrence after resection. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2001 : 30(1): 62-64.
  7. 7. Siebenrock KA, Ganz R. Osteochondroma of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (394): 211-218. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200201000-00025>.




Clinical Osteology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.