Clin Osteol 2010; 15(1): 26-29

Potential use of total body densitometry in metabolic syndrome patients - body fat measurementsOriginal contributions

K. Brázdilová, Z. Killinger, J. Payer

Currently, there is an increasing number of overweight or obese patients. Obesity has become the most common lifestyle disease. It re­ presents a serious risk factor for cardiovascular and other diseases, not only in metabolic syndrome but also as a separate disease en­ tity. Physicians have always been concerned about the amount of body fat. In the past, various more or less precise methods were used for body fat measurements. Recently, attention has been paid to densitometry which appears to be most suitable for measuring the amount of fat in the metabolically most important abdominal area. Our study aimed at measuring body fat with a total body densito­ meter and correlating the data with waist circumference and BMI. A group of 35 patients was examined (19 females, 16 males; 20 pa­ tients with metabolic syndrome, 15 patients without metabolic syndrome; age range 29-79 years) The average values were as follows: age 47.75 years, waist circumference 83.9 cm, BMI 24.83 kg/m2 and body fat 32.15%. It was ascertained that in both metabolic syn­ drome patients and control subjects, the amount of body fat was significantly underestimated if BMI was used as compared with body fat measurements with a total body densitometer. Moreover, the amount of body fat measured with the total body densitometer is better correlated with waist circumference than with BMI.

Keywords: obesity, metabolic syndrome, densitometry

Published: June 11, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Brázdilová K, Killinger Z, Payer J. Potential use of total body densitometry in metabolic syndrome patients - body fat measurements. Osteologický bulletin. 2010;15(1):26-29.
Download citation

References

  1. Brázdilová K, Payer J. Vzťah metabolického syndrómu a vitamínu D a kalcia. Osteol bull 2008;13:57-64.
  2. Galajda P, Mokáň M, Prídavková D et al. Prevalencia metabolického syndrómu na Slovensku. Int med 2007;6:325-331.
  3. Svačina Š. Metabolický syndróm. Praha, Triton 2006:284.
  4. Zhu S, Wang Z, Shen W et al. Percentage body fat ranges associated with meta­ bolic syndrome risk: results based on the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994). Am J Clin Nutr 2003;78:228-235. Go to original source...
  5. Brázdilová K, Killinger Z, Payer J. Využitie denzitometrie na meranie telesného tuku u pacientov s metabolickým syndrómom. Rheumatol 2008;22:117-120.
  6. Brownbill RA, Ilich JZ. Measuring body composition in overweight individuals by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. BMC Med Imaging 2005;5:1. Go to original source...
  7. Cummings SR, Palermo L, Browner W et al. Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: misleading changes and regression to the mean. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. JAMA 2000;283:1318-1321. Go to original source...
  8. Laskey MA. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition. Nutrition 1996;12:45-51. Go to original source...
  9. GE Healthcare. Total body data and regional results. 2007.
  10. Diessell E. Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control anf cross-calibration of DXA devices. J Appl Physiol 2000;89:599-605. Go to original source...
  11. Chinappen-Horsley U, Blake GM, Fogelman I et al. A method for determining skeletal lengths from DXA images. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;8:113. Go to original source...
  12. Demura S, Sato S. Suprailiac or abdominal skinfold thickness measured with a skinfold caliper as a predictor of body density in Japanese adults. Tohoku J Exp Med 2007;213:51-61. Go to original source...
  13. Lupoli L, Sergi G, Coin A et al. Body composition in underweight elderly sub­ jects: reliability of bioelectrical impedance analysis. Clin Nutr 2004;23:1371-1380. Go to original source...
  14. Thomasset A. Measurement ofthe extracellular fluid volume by the electrochemi­ cal method. Biophysical significance of 1 kilocycle impedance of the human bo­ dy. Lyon Med 1965;214:131-143.
  15. Hoffer EC, Meador CK, Simpson DC. Correlation of whole-body impedance with total body water volume. J Appl Physiol 1969;27:531-534. Go to original source...
  16. Levitt DG, Heymsfield SB, Pierson RN Jr et al. Physiological models of body composition and human obesity. Nutr Metab 2007;4:19. Go to original source...
  17. Snijder MB, Visser M, Dekker JM et al. The prediction of visceral fat by dual­ energy X-ray absorptiometry in the elderly: a comparison with computed tomo­ graphy and anthropometry. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:984-993. Go to original source...




Clinical Osteology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.